2004-02-13 01:44:53 +01:00
|
|
|
/****************************************************************************
|
|
|
|
* VCGLib o o *
|
|
|
|
* Visual and Computer Graphics Library o o *
|
|
|
|
* _ O _ *
|
|
|
|
* Copyright(C) 2004 \/)\/ *
|
|
|
|
* Visual Computing Lab /\/| *
|
|
|
|
* ISTI - Italian National Research Council | *
|
|
|
|
* \ *
|
|
|
|
* All rights reserved. *
|
|
|
|
* *
|
make point2 derived Eigen's Matrix, and a set of minimal fixes to make meshlab compile
with both old and new version. The fixes include:
- dot product: vec0 * vec1 => vec0.dot(vec1) (I added .dot() to the old Point classes too)
- Transpose: Transpose is an Eigen type, so we cannot keep it if Eigen is used. Therefore
I added a .tranpose() to old matrix classes, and modified most of the Transpose() to transpose()
both in vcg and meshlab. In fact, transpose() are free with Eigen, it simply returns a transpose
expression without copies. On the other be carefull: m = m.transpose() won't work as expected,
here me must evaluate to a temporary: m = m.transpose().eval(); However, this operation in very
rarely needed: you transpose at the same sime you set m, or you use m.transpose() directly.
- the last issue is Normalize which both modifies *this and return a ref to it. This behavior
don't make sense anymore when using expression template, e.g., in (a+b).Normalize(), the type
of a+b if not a Point (or whatever Vector types), it an expression of the addition of 2 points,
so we cannot modify the value of *this, since there is no value. Therefore I've already changed
all those .Normalize() of expressions to the Eigen's version .normalized().
- Finally I've changed the Zero to SetZero in the old Point classes too.
2008-10-28 01:59:46 +01:00
|
|
|
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify *
|
2004-02-13 01:44:53 +01:00
|
|
|
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by *
|
|
|
|
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or *
|
|
|
|
* (at your option) any later version. *
|
|
|
|
* *
|
|
|
|
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, *
|
|
|
|
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of *
|
|
|
|
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the *
|
|
|
|
* GNU General Public License (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt) *
|
|
|
|
* for more details. *
|
|
|
|
* *
|
|
|
|
****************************************************************************/
|
2005-03-18 17:35:53 +01:00
|
|
|
|
make point2 derived Eigen's Matrix, and a set of minimal fixes to make meshlab compile
with both old and new version. The fixes include:
- dot product: vec0 * vec1 => vec0.dot(vec1) (I added .dot() to the old Point classes too)
- Transpose: Transpose is an Eigen type, so we cannot keep it if Eigen is used. Therefore
I added a .tranpose() to old matrix classes, and modified most of the Transpose() to transpose()
both in vcg and meshlab. In fact, transpose() are free with Eigen, it simply returns a transpose
expression without copies. On the other be carefull: m = m.transpose() won't work as expected,
here me must evaluate to a temporary: m = m.transpose().eval(); However, this operation in very
rarely needed: you transpose at the same sime you set m, or you use m.transpose() directly.
- the last issue is Normalize which both modifies *this and return a ref to it. This behavior
don't make sense anymore when using expression template, e.g., in (a+b).Normalize(), the type
of a+b if not a Point (or whatever Vector types), it an expression of the addition of 2 points,
so we cannot modify the value of *this, since there is no value. Therefore I've already changed
all those .Normalize() of expressions to the Eigen's version .normalized().
- Finally I've changed the Zero to SetZero in the old Point classes too.
2008-10-28 01:59:46 +01:00
|
|
|
#ifndef VCG_USE_EIGEN
|
|
|
|
#include "deprecated_point2.h"
|
|
|
|
#else
|
2004-02-13 01:44:53 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef __VCGLIB_POINT2
|
|
|
|
#define __VCGLIB_POINT2
|
|
|
|
|
make point2 derived Eigen's Matrix, and a set of minimal fixes to make meshlab compile
with both old and new version. The fixes include:
- dot product: vec0 * vec1 => vec0.dot(vec1) (I added .dot() to the old Point classes too)
- Transpose: Transpose is an Eigen type, so we cannot keep it if Eigen is used. Therefore
I added a .tranpose() to old matrix classes, and modified most of the Transpose() to transpose()
both in vcg and meshlab. In fact, transpose() are free with Eigen, it simply returns a transpose
expression without copies. On the other be carefull: m = m.transpose() won't work as expected,
here me must evaluate to a temporary: m = m.transpose().eval(); However, this operation in very
rarely needed: you transpose at the same sime you set m, or you use m.transpose() directly.
- the last issue is Normalize which both modifies *this and return a ref to it. This behavior
don't make sense anymore when using expression template, e.g., in (a+b).Normalize(), the type
of a+b if not a Point (or whatever Vector types), it an expression of the addition of 2 points,
so we cannot modify the value of *this, since there is no value. Therefore I've already changed
all those .Normalize() of expressions to the Eigen's version .normalized().
- Finally I've changed the Zero to SetZero in the old Point classes too.
2008-10-28 01:59:46 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "../math/eigen.h"
|
2008-10-28 21:06:17 +01:00
|
|
|
// #include "point.h"
|
2004-02-13 01:44:53 +01:00
|
|
|
|
make point2 derived Eigen's Matrix, and a set of minimal fixes to make meshlab compile
with both old and new version. The fixes include:
- dot product: vec0 * vec1 => vec0.dot(vec1) (I added .dot() to the old Point classes too)
- Transpose: Transpose is an Eigen type, so we cannot keep it if Eigen is used. Therefore
I added a .tranpose() to old matrix classes, and modified most of the Transpose() to transpose()
both in vcg and meshlab. In fact, transpose() are free with Eigen, it simply returns a transpose
expression without copies. On the other be carefull: m = m.transpose() won't work as expected,
here me must evaluate to a temporary: m = m.transpose().eval(); However, this operation in very
rarely needed: you transpose at the same sime you set m, or you use m.transpose() directly.
- the last issue is Normalize which both modifies *this and return a ref to it. This behavior
don't make sense anymore when using expression template, e.g., in (a+b).Normalize(), the type
of a+b if not a Point (or whatever Vector types), it an expression of the addition of 2 points,
so we cannot modify the value of *this, since there is no value. Therefore I've already changed
all those .Normalize() of expressions to the Eigen's version .normalized().
- Finally I've changed the Zero to SetZero in the old Point classes too.
2008-10-28 01:59:46 +01:00
|
|
|
namespace vcg{
|
2008-10-28 21:06:17 +01:00
|
|
|
template<typename Scalar> class Point2;
|
make point2 derived Eigen's Matrix, and a set of minimal fixes to make meshlab compile
with both old and new version. The fixes include:
- dot product: vec0 * vec1 => vec0.dot(vec1) (I added .dot() to the old Point classes too)
- Transpose: Transpose is an Eigen type, so we cannot keep it if Eigen is used. Therefore
I added a .tranpose() to old matrix classes, and modified most of the Transpose() to transpose()
both in vcg and meshlab. In fact, transpose() are free with Eigen, it simply returns a transpose
expression without copies. On the other be carefull: m = m.transpose() won't work as expected,
here me must evaluate to a temporary: m = m.transpose().eval(); However, this operation in very
rarely needed: you transpose at the same sime you set m, or you use m.transpose() directly.
- the last issue is Normalize which both modifies *this and return a ref to it. This behavior
don't make sense anymore when using expression template, e.g., in (a+b).Normalize(), the type
of a+b if not a Point (or whatever Vector types), it an expression of the addition of 2 points,
so we cannot modify the value of *this, since there is no value. Therefore I've already changed
all those .Normalize() of expressions to the Eigen's version .normalized().
- Finally I've changed the Zero to SetZero in the old Point classes too.
2008-10-28 01:59:46 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2008-10-28 21:06:17 +01:00
|
|
|
namespace Eigen {
|
|
|
|
template<typename Scalar> struct ei_traits<vcg::Point2<Scalar> > : ei_traits<Eigen::Matrix<Scalar,2,1> > {};
|
2008-10-29 01:05:44 +01:00
|
|
|
template<typename XprType> struct ei_to_vcgtype<XprType,2,1,0,2,1>
|
|
|
|
{ typedef vcg::Point2<typename XprType::Scalar> type; };
|
make point2 derived Eigen's Matrix, and a set of minimal fixes to make meshlab compile
with both old and new version. The fixes include:
- dot product: vec0 * vec1 => vec0.dot(vec1) (I added .dot() to the old Point classes too)
- Transpose: Transpose is an Eigen type, so we cannot keep it if Eigen is used. Therefore
I added a .tranpose() to old matrix classes, and modified most of the Transpose() to transpose()
both in vcg and meshlab. In fact, transpose() are free with Eigen, it simply returns a transpose
expression without copies. On the other be carefull: m = m.transpose() won't work as expected,
here me must evaluate to a temporary: m = m.transpose().eval(); However, this operation in very
rarely needed: you transpose at the same sime you set m, or you use m.transpose() directly.
- the last issue is Normalize which both modifies *this and return a ref to it. This behavior
don't make sense anymore when using expression template, e.g., in (a+b).Normalize(), the type
of a+b if not a Point (or whatever Vector types), it an expression of the addition of 2 points,
so we cannot modify the value of *this, since there is no value. Therefore I've already changed
all those .Normalize() of expressions to the Eigen's version .normalized().
- Finally I've changed the Zero to SetZero in the old Point classes too.
2008-10-28 01:59:46 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2004-02-13 01:44:53 +01:00
|
|
|
namespace vcg {
|
|
|
|
|
2004-03-10 18:42:40 +01:00
|
|
|
/** \addtogroup space */
|
|
|
|
/*@{*/
|
2008-10-28 21:06:17 +01:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
The templated class for representing a point in 2D space.
|
|
|
|
The class is templated over the Scalar class that is used to represent coordinates.
|
|
|
|
All the usual operator overloading (* + - ...) is present.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
make point2 derived Eigen's Matrix, and a set of minimal fixes to make meshlab compile
with both old and new version. The fixes include:
- dot product: vec0 * vec1 => vec0.dot(vec1) (I added .dot() to the old Point classes too)
- Transpose: Transpose is an Eigen type, so we cannot keep it if Eigen is used. Therefore
I added a .tranpose() to old matrix classes, and modified most of the Transpose() to transpose()
both in vcg and meshlab. In fact, transpose() are free with Eigen, it simply returns a transpose
expression without copies. On the other be carefull: m = m.transpose() won't work as expected,
here me must evaluate to a temporary: m = m.transpose().eval(); However, this operation in very
rarely needed: you transpose at the same sime you set m, or you use m.transpose() directly.
- the last issue is Normalize which both modifies *this and return a ref to it. This behavior
don't make sense anymore when using expression template, e.g., in (a+b).Normalize(), the type
of a+b if not a Point (or whatever Vector types), it an expression of the addition of 2 points,
so we cannot modify the value of *this, since there is no value. Therefore I've already changed
all those .Normalize() of expressions to the Eigen's version .normalized().
- Finally I've changed the Zero to SetZero in the old Point classes too.
2008-10-28 01:59:46 +01:00
|
|
|
template <class _Scalar> class Point2 : public Eigen::Matrix<_Scalar,2,1>
|
2004-02-13 01:44:53 +01:00
|
|
|
{
|
2008-10-28 21:06:17 +01:00
|
|
|
//----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
// template typedef part
|
|
|
|
// use it as follow: typename Point2<S>::Type instead of simply Point2<S>
|
|
|
|
//----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
|
|
typedef Eigen::Matrix<_Scalar,2,1> Type;
|
|
|
|
//----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
// inheritence part
|
|
|
|
//----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
private:
|
make point2 derived Eigen's Matrix, and a set of minimal fixes to make meshlab compile
with both old and new version. The fixes include:
- dot product: vec0 * vec1 => vec0.dot(vec1) (I added .dot() to the old Point classes too)
- Transpose: Transpose is an Eigen type, so we cannot keep it if Eigen is used. Therefore
I added a .tranpose() to old matrix classes, and modified most of the Transpose() to transpose()
both in vcg and meshlab. In fact, transpose() are free with Eigen, it simply returns a transpose
expression without copies. On the other be carefull: m = m.transpose() won't work as expected,
here me must evaluate to a temporary: m = m.transpose().eval(); However, this operation in very
rarely needed: you transpose at the same sime you set m, or you use m.transpose() directly.
- the last issue is Normalize which both modifies *this and return a ref to it. This behavior
don't make sense anymore when using expression template, e.g., in (a+b).Normalize(), the type
of a+b if not a Point (or whatever Vector types), it an expression of the addition of 2 points,
so we cannot modify the value of *this, since there is no value. Therefore I've already changed
all those .Normalize() of expressions to the Eigen's version .normalized().
- Finally I've changed the Zero to SetZero in the old Point classes too.
2008-10-28 01:59:46 +01:00
|
|
|
typedef Eigen::Matrix<_Scalar,2,1> _Base;
|
2008-10-29 12:28:51 +01:00
|
|
|
public:
|
make point2 derived Eigen's Matrix, and a set of minimal fixes to make meshlab compile
with both old and new version. The fixes include:
- dot product: vec0 * vec1 => vec0.dot(vec1) (I added .dot() to the old Point classes too)
- Transpose: Transpose is an Eigen type, so we cannot keep it if Eigen is used. Therefore
I added a .tranpose() to old matrix classes, and modified most of the Transpose() to transpose()
both in vcg and meshlab. In fact, transpose() are free with Eigen, it simply returns a transpose
expression without copies. On the other be carefull: m = m.transpose() won't work as expected,
here me must evaluate to a temporary: m = m.transpose().eval(); However, this operation in very
rarely needed: you transpose at the same sime you set m, or you use m.transpose() directly.
- the last issue is Normalize which both modifies *this and return a ref to it. This behavior
don't make sense anymore when using expression template, e.g., in (a+b).Normalize(), the type
of a+b if not a Point (or whatever Vector types), it an expression of the addition of 2 points,
so we cannot modify the value of *this, since there is no value. Therefore I've already changed
all those .Normalize() of expressions to the Eigen's version .normalized().
- Finally I've changed the Zero to SetZero in the old Point classes too.
2008-10-28 01:59:46 +01:00
|
|
|
using _Base::coeff;
|
|
|
|
using _Base::coeffRef;
|
|
|
|
using _Base::setZero;
|
|
|
|
using _Base::data;
|
|
|
|
using _Base::V;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_EIGEN_GENERIC_PUBLIC_INTERFACE(Point2,_Base);
|
|
|
|
VCG_EIGEN_INHERIT_ASSIGNMENT_OPERATORS(Point2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// empty constructor (does nothing)
|
2004-02-13 01:44:53 +01:00
|
|
|
inline Point2 () { }
|
make point2 derived Eigen's Matrix, and a set of minimal fixes to make meshlab compile
with both old and new version. The fixes include:
- dot product: vec0 * vec1 => vec0.dot(vec1) (I added .dot() to the old Point classes too)
- Transpose: Transpose is an Eigen type, so we cannot keep it if Eigen is used. Therefore
I added a .tranpose() to old matrix classes, and modified most of the Transpose() to transpose()
both in vcg and meshlab. In fact, transpose() are free with Eigen, it simply returns a transpose
expression without copies. On the other be carefull: m = m.transpose() won't work as expected,
here me must evaluate to a temporary: m = m.transpose().eval(); However, this operation in very
rarely needed: you transpose at the same sime you set m, or you use m.transpose() directly.
- the last issue is Normalize which both modifies *this and return a ref to it. This behavior
don't make sense anymore when using expression template, e.g., in (a+b).Normalize(), the type
of a+b if not a Point (or whatever Vector types), it an expression of the addition of 2 points,
so we cannot modify the value of *this, since there is no value. Therefore I've already changed
all those .Normalize() of expressions to the Eigen's version .normalized().
- Finally I've changed the Zero to SetZero in the old Point classes too.
2008-10-28 01:59:46 +01:00
|
|
|
/// x,y constructor
|
|
|
|
inline Point2 ( const Scalar nx, const Scalar ny ) : Base(nx,ny) {}
|
|
|
|
/// copy constructor
|
|
|
|
inline Point2(Point2 const & p) : Base(p) {}
|
|
|
|
template<typename OtherDerived>
|
|
|
|
inline Point2(const Eigen::MatrixBase<OtherDerived>& other) : Base(other) {}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// cross product
|
2008-10-28 12:47:37 +01:00
|
|
|
// hm.. this is not really a cross product
|
make point2 derived Eigen's Matrix, and a set of minimal fixes to make meshlab compile
with both old and new version. The fixes include:
- dot product: vec0 * vec1 => vec0.dot(vec1) (I added .dot() to the old Point classes too)
- Transpose: Transpose is an Eigen type, so we cannot keep it if Eigen is used. Therefore
I added a .tranpose() to old matrix classes, and modified most of the Transpose() to transpose()
both in vcg and meshlab. In fact, transpose() are free with Eigen, it simply returns a transpose
expression without copies. On the other be carefull: m = m.transpose() won't work as expected,
here me must evaluate to a temporary: m = m.transpose().eval(); However, this operation in very
rarely needed: you transpose at the same sime you set m, or you use m.transpose() directly.
- the last issue is Normalize which both modifies *this and return a ref to it. This behavior
don't make sense anymore when using expression template, e.g., in (a+b).Normalize(), the type
of a+b if not a Point (or whatever Vector types), it an expression of the addition of 2 points,
so we cannot modify the value of *this, since there is no value. Therefore I've already changed
all those .Normalize() of expressions to the Eigen's version .normalized().
- Finally I've changed the Zero to SetZero in the old Point classes too.
2008-10-28 01:59:46 +01:00
|
|
|
inline Scalar operator ^ ( Point2 const & p ) const
|
2004-02-13 01:44:53 +01:00
|
|
|
{
|
make point2 derived Eigen's Matrix, and a set of minimal fixes to make meshlab compile
with both old and new version. The fixes include:
- dot product: vec0 * vec1 => vec0.dot(vec1) (I added .dot() to the old Point classes too)
- Transpose: Transpose is an Eigen type, so we cannot keep it if Eigen is used. Therefore
I added a .tranpose() to old matrix classes, and modified most of the Transpose() to transpose()
both in vcg and meshlab. In fact, transpose() are free with Eigen, it simply returns a transpose
expression without copies. On the other be carefull: m = m.transpose() won't work as expected,
here me must evaluate to a temporary: m = m.transpose().eval(); However, this operation in very
rarely needed: you transpose at the same sime you set m, or you use m.transpose() directly.
- the last issue is Normalize which both modifies *this and return a ref to it. This behavior
don't make sense anymore when using expression template, e.g., in (a+b).Normalize(), the type
of a+b if not a Point (or whatever Vector types), it an expression of the addition of 2 points,
so we cannot modify the value of *this, since there is no value. Therefore I've already changed
all those .Normalize() of expressions to the Eigen's version .normalized().
- Finally I've changed the Zero to SetZero in the old Point classes too.
2008-10-28 01:59:46 +01:00
|
|
|
return data()[0]*p.data()[1] - data()[1]*p.data()[0];
|
2004-02-13 01:44:53 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
make point2 derived Eigen's Matrix, and a set of minimal fixes to make meshlab compile
with both old and new version. The fixes include:
- dot product: vec0 * vec1 => vec0.dot(vec1) (I added .dot() to the old Point classes too)
- Transpose: Transpose is an Eigen type, so we cannot keep it if Eigen is used. Therefore
I added a .tranpose() to old matrix classes, and modified most of the Transpose() to transpose()
both in vcg and meshlab. In fact, transpose() are free with Eigen, it simply returns a transpose
expression without copies. On the other be carefull: m = m.transpose() won't work as expected,
here me must evaluate to a temporary: m = m.transpose().eval(); However, this operation in very
rarely needed: you transpose at the same sime you set m, or you use m.transpose() directly.
- the last issue is Normalize which both modifies *this and return a ref to it. This behavior
don't make sense anymore when using expression template, e.g., in (a+b).Normalize(), the type
of a+b if not a Point (or whatever Vector types), it an expression of the addition of 2 points,
so we cannot modify the value of *this, since there is no value. Therefore I've already changed
all those .Normalize() of expressions to the Eigen's version .normalized().
- Finally I've changed the Zero to SetZero in the old Point classes too.
2008-10-28 01:59:46 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// returns the angle with X axis (radiants, in [-PI, +PI] )
|
2008-10-28 12:47:37 +01:00
|
|
|
inline Scalar Angle() const
|
|
|
|
{
|
make point2 derived Eigen's Matrix, and a set of minimal fixes to make meshlab compile
with both old and new version. The fixes include:
- dot product: vec0 * vec1 => vec0.dot(vec1) (I added .dot() to the old Point classes too)
- Transpose: Transpose is an Eigen type, so we cannot keep it if Eigen is used. Therefore
I added a .tranpose() to old matrix classes, and modified most of the Transpose() to transpose()
both in vcg and meshlab. In fact, transpose() are free with Eigen, it simply returns a transpose
expression without copies. On the other be carefull: m = m.transpose() won't work as expected,
here me must evaluate to a temporary: m = m.transpose().eval(); However, this operation in very
rarely needed: you transpose at the same sime you set m, or you use m.transpose() directly.
- the last issue is Normalize which both modifies *this and return a ref to it. This behavior
don't make sense anymore when using expression template, e.g., in (a+b).Normalize(), the type
of a+b if not a Point (or whatever Vector types), it an expression of the addition of 2 points,
so we cannot modify the value of *this, since there is no value. Therefore I've already changed
all those .Normalize() of expressions to the Eigen's version .normalized().
- Finally I've changed the Zero to SetZero in the old Point classes too.
2008-10-28 01:59:46 +01:00
|
|
|
return math::Atan2(data()[1],data()[0]);
|
2004-05-10 15:22:25 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2008-10-28 21:06:17 +01:00
|
|
|
/// transform the point in cartesian coords into polar coords
|
2004-02-13 01:44:53 +01:00
|
|
|
inline Point2 & Cartesian2Polar()
|
|
|
|
{
|
make point2 derived Eigen's Matrix, and a set of minimal fixes to make meshlab compile
with both old and new version. The fixes include:
- dot product: vec0 * vec1 => vec0.dot(vec1) (I added .dot() to the old Point classes too)
- Transpose: Transpose is an Eigen type, so we cannot keep it if Eigen is used. Therefore
I added a .tranpose() to old matrix classes, and modified most of the Transpose() to transpose()
both in vcg and meshlab. In fact, transpose() are free with Eigen, it simply returns a transpose
expression without copies. On the other be carefull: m = m.transpose() won't work as expected,
here me must evaluate to a temporary: m = m.transpose().eval(); However, this operation in very
rarely needed: you transpose at the same sime you set m, or you use m.transpose() directly.
- the last issue is Normalize which both modifies *this and return a ref to it. This behavior
don't make sense anymore when using expression template, e.g., in (a+b).Normalize(), the type
of a+b if not a Point (or whatever Vector types), it an expression of the addition of 2 points,
so we cannot modify the value of *this, since there is no value. Therefore I've already changed
all those .Normalize() of expressions to the Eigen's version .normalized().
- Finally I've changed the Zero to SetZero in the old Point classes too.
2008-10-28 01:59:46 +01:00
|
|
|
Scalar t = Angle();
|
|
|
|
data()[0] = this->norm();
|
|
|
|
data()[1] = t;
|
2004-02-13 01:44:53 +01:00
|
|
|
return *this;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2008-10-28 21:06:17 +01:00
|
|
|
/// transform the point in polar coords into cartesian coords
|
2004-02-13 01:44:53 +01:00
|
|
|
inline Point2 & Polar2Cartesian()
|
|
|
|
{
|
make point2 derived Eigen's Matrix, and a set of minimal fixes to make meshlab compile
with both old and new version. The fixes include:
- dot product: vec0 * vec1 => vec0.dot(vec1) (I added .dot() to the old Point classes too)
- Transpose: Transpose is an Eigen type, so we cannot keep it if Eigen is used. Therefore
I added a .tranpose() to old matrix classes, and modified most of the Transpose() to transpose()
both in vcg and meshlab. In fact, transpose() are free with Eigen, it simply returns a transpose
expression without copies. On the other be carefull: m = m.transpose() won't work as expected,
here me must evaluate to a temporary: m = m.transpose().eval(); However, this operation in very
rarely needed: you transpose at the same sime you set m, or you use m.transpose() directly.
- the last issue is Normalize which both modifies *this and return a ref to it. This behavior
don't make sense anymore when using expression template, e.g., in (a+b).Normalize(), the type
of a+b if not a Point (or whatever Vector types), it an expression of the addition of 2 points,
so we cannot modify the value of *this, since there is no value. Therefore I've already changed
all those .Normalize() of expressions to the Eigen's version .normalized().
- Finally I've changed the Zero to SetZero in the old Point classes too.
2008-10-28 01:59:46 +01:00
|
|
|
Scalar l = data()[0];
|
|
|
|
data()[0] = (Scalar)(l*math::Cos(data()[1]));
|
|
|
|
data()[1] = (Scalar)(l*math::Sin(data()[1]));
|
2004-02-13 01:44:53 +01:00
|
|
|
return *this;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2008-10-28 21:06:17 +01:00
|
|
|
/// rotates the point of an angle (radiants, counterclockwise)
|
make point2 derived Eigen's Matrix, and a set of minimal fixes to make meshlab compile
with both old and new version. The fixes include:
- dot product: vec0 * vec1 => vec0.dot(vec1) (I added .dot() to the old Point classes too)
- Transpose: Transpose is an Eigen type, so we cannot keep it if Eigen is used. Therefore
I added a .tranpose() to old matrix classes, and modified most of the Transpose() to transpose()
both in vcg and meshlab. In fact, transpose() are free with Eigen, it simply returns a transpose
expression without copies. On the other be carefull: m = m.transpose() won't work as expected,
here me must evaluate to a temporary: m = m.transpose().eval(); However, this operation in very
rarely needed: you transpose at the same sime you set m, or you use m.transpose() directly.
- the last issue is Normalize which both modifies *this and return a ref to it. This behavior
don't make sense anymore when using expression template, e.g., in (a+b).Normalize(), the type
of a+b if not a Point (or whatever Vector types), it an expression of the addition of 2 points,
so we cannot modify the value of *this, since there is no value. Therefore I've already changed
all those .Normalize() of expressions to the Eigen's version .normalized().
- Finally I've changed the Zero to SetZero in the old Point classes too.
2008-10-28 01:59:46 +01:00
|
|
|
inline Point2 & Rotate( const Scalar rad )
|
2004-02-13 01:44:53 +01:00
|
|
|
{
|
make point2 derived Eigen's Matrix, and a set of minimal fixes to make meshlab compile
with both old and new version. The fixes include:
- dot product: vec0 * vec1 => vec0.dot(vec1) (I added .dot() to the old Point classes too)
- Transpose: Transpose is an Eigen type, so we cannot keep it if Eigen is used. Therefore
I added a .tranpose() to old matrix classes, and modified most of the Transpose() to transpose()
both in vcg and meshlab. In fact, transpose() are free with Eigen, it simply returns a transpose
expression without copies. On the other be carefull: m = m.transpose() won't work as expected,
here me must evaluate to a temporary: m = m.transpose().eval(); However, this operation in very
rarely needed: you transpose at the same sime you set m, or you use m.transpose() directly.
- the last issue is Normalize which both modifies *this and return a ref to it. This behavior
don't make sense anymore when using expression template, e.g., in (a+b).Normalize(), the type
of a+b if not a Point (or whatever Vector types), it an expression of the addition of 2 points,
so we cannot modify the value of *this, since there is no value. Therefore I've already changed
all those .Normalize() of expressions to the Eigen's version .normalized().
- Finally I've changed the Zero to SetZero in the old Point classes too.
2008-10-28 01:59:46 +01:00
|
|
|
Scalar t = data()[0];
|
|
|
|
Scalar s = math::Sin(rad);
|
|
|
|
Scalar c = math::Cos(rad);
|
2004-02-13 01:44:53 +01:00
|
|
|
|
make point2 derived Eigen's Matrix, and a set of minimal fixes to make meshlab compile
with both old and new version. The fixes include:
- dot product: vec0 * vec1 => vec0.dot(vec1) (I added .dot() to the old Point classes too)
- Transpose: Transpose is an Eigen type, so we cannot keep it if Eigen is used. Therefore
I added a .tranpose() to old matrix classes, and modified most of the Transpose() to transpose()
both in vcg and meshlab. In fact, transpose() are free with Eigen, it simply returns a transpose
expression without copies. On the other be carefull: m = m.transpose() won't work as expected,
here me must evaluate to a temporary: m = m.transpose().eval(); However, this operation in very
rarely needed: you transpose at the same sime you set m, or you use m.transpose() directly.
- the last issue is Normalize which both modifies *this and return a ref to it. This behavior
don't make sense anymore when using expression template, e.g., in (a+b).Normalize(), the type
of a+b if not a Point (or whatever Vector types), it an expression of the addition of 2 points,
so we cannot modify the value of *this, since there is no value. Therefore I've already changed
all those .Normalize() of expressions to the Eigen's version .normalized().
- Finally I've changed the Zero to SetZero in the old Point classes too.
2008-10-28 01:59:46 +01:00
|
|
|
data()[0] = data()[0]*c - data()[1]*s;
|
|
|
|
data()[1] = t *s + data()[1]*c;
|
2004-02-13 01:44:53 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return *this;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}; // end class definition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef Point2<short> Point2s;
|
|
|
|
typedef Point2<int> Point2i;
|
|
|
|
typedef Point2<float> Point2f;
|
|
|
|
typedef Point2<double> Point2d;
|
|
|
|
|
2008-10-28 21:06:17 +01:00
|
|
|
// typedef Eigen::Matrix<short ,2,1> Point2s;
|
|
|
|
// typedef Eigen::Matrix<int ,2,1> Point2i;
|
|
|
|
// typedef Eigen::Matrix<float ,2,1> Point2f;
|
|
|
|
// typedef Eigen::Matrix<double,2,1> Point2d;
|
|
|
|
// typedef Eigen::Matrix<short ,2,1> Vector2s;
|
|
|
|
// typedef Eigen::Matrix<int ,2,1> Vector2i;
|
|
|
|
// typedef Eigen::Matrix<float ,2,1> Vector2f;
|
|
|
|
// typedef Eigen::Matrix<double,2,1> Vector2d;
|
|
|
|
|
2004-03-10 18:42:40 +01:00
|
|
|
/*@}*/
|
2004-02-13 01:44:53 +01:00
|
|
|
} // end namespace
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
make point2 derived Eigen's Matrix, and a set of minimal fixes to make meshlab compile
with both old and new version. The fixes include:
- dot product: vec0 * vec1 => vec0.dot(vec1) (I added .dot() to the old Point classes too)
- Transpose: Transpose is an Eigen type, so we cannot keep it if Eigen is used. Therefore
I added a .tranpose() to old matrix classes, and modified most of the Transpose() to transpose()
both in vcg and meshlab. In fact, transpose() are free with Eigen, it simply returns a transpose
expression without copies. On the other be carefull: m = m.transpose() won't work as expected,
here me must evaluate to a temporary: m = m.transpose().eval(); However, this operation in very
rarely needed: you transpose at the same sime you set m, or you use m.transpose() directly.
- the last issue is Normalize which both modifies *this and return a ref to it. This behavior
don't make sense anymore when using expression template, e.g., in (a+b).Normalize(), the type
of a+b if not a Point (or whatever Vector types), it an expression of the addition of 2 points,
so we cannot modify the value of *this, since there is no value. Therefore I've already changed
all those .Normalize() of expressions to the Eigen's version .normalized().
- Finally I've changed the Zero to SetZero in the old Point classes too.
2008-10-28 01:59:46 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|